COMMENTARY: Oh D!

By Patricia Greuter
for 2ManAdvantage.com

Published: October 10, 2007

Poor Mattie.UPDATE: Well, looks like Richard Matvichuk’s days as a Devil really are over. As reported by Tom Gulitti, the Devils will attempt to trade the 34-year-old defender. What they will get, I do not know. Don’t expect much.

I’m not surprised, to be quite honest. It’s funny, I wrote this piece today with the thought that Mattie would likely be waived or traded. Didn’t think it would happen this soon, but I suppose now is as good a time as any.

Regardless, best of luck to Mattie, where ever you may land — loved ya during the post-season, but your shot-block-awesomeness just wasn’t enough to keep ya in New Jersey.

Sorry.

_________

So, we’re a mere three games into the season, and while many fans are already deeming Red ‘n Black’s season to be a monumental bomb, I am sitting back, waiting rather patiently for one major component of this here team’s system to, well, actually come through.

Yes, I am talking about the defense.

Come on folks, this team is just fine outside of an obviously confused looking blueline. The forecheck is as hard as it’s ever been, the goaltending has looked more than effective, and the physicality has been, well, quite physical.

All positives.

Sigh.What makes my poor head ache is the lack of coordination and general awareness of the defense. While guys like Karel Rachunek and Andrew Greene have stepped up in the offensive scheme of things, they have severely faltered in their own end — and that’s not to mention the obvious shortcomings of one Mr. Johnny Oduya. Okay, okay — Oduya looked significantly better on Monday, but still, he has not impressed me enough to pull his sorry little Swedish butt out of the doghouse.

Paul Martin, our clear #1, has looked as confused as ever on the ice. He made several miscues in Monday’s 4-2 loss against the mighty Ottawa Senators. No good.

Who’s left? Ah, the supposed scrubs that are Mike Mottau and Vitaly Vishnevski. I will say, the former has actually been our best defenseman, while the latter, uh…well, I don’t really remember much from the latter, because he hasn’t done anything to warrant accolades or drubbings. I’m not sure if that’s a good or bad thing.

MAKE YOUR EYE BETTER, DAMNIT!Dare I say, I miss Anger?

Well, I do. A lot.
We need Whitey back, baaaad. Sure, he’s known to take a dumb penalty or two over the course of a 60 minute game, but I will admit — with what we have right now, I certainly wouldn’t mind those penalties provided he actually helped our netminder out every once and a while.

Let’s face it: the current state of New Jersey Defense is a sad state.

The sheer volume of shots allowed this season alone is enough to send a Devils fan into a furious frenzy. For Brodeur, against Ottawa, he faced 36 shots. The defense fared much better in a 3-1 loss against Tampa Bay, surrendering 23 shots. Kevin Weekes had it far much worse, though, facing 33 shot — 21 alone in the first period! The Devils went on to win that game 4-1, but had it not been for Weekesie, the outcome would have been dramatically different.

My biggest gripe with the D is their confusion displayed on the ice. Lack of talent is one thing, but when you simply look confused on the ice, well, that’s just not good. In each of the three games played so far, I’ve noticed the defenders simply give up on their positioning and instead create a logjam of traffic in front of the goalie, making it an easy feat for a player to merely pick up a loose puck and fling it past a so-badly-screened Devils goalie. In fact, I’ve noticed this successfully happen at least three times, and many more times unsuccessfully.

Guys, this is the NHL, not Mites on Ice — you can’t create a mush of what-the-hell-is-going-on and expect for the best. Mmkay?

Another problem that should heavily be noted is, well, actually something that can be a strength for the boys: the forecheck. It seems, honest to you-know-who, that the forecheck is so gosh darn aggressive that the boys simply cannot skate back in time to save the day when the opposition has the puck.

Don’t you hate when an asset is also a flaw?

So, how do we fix these problems?

Hey, don’t ask me — I’m not the monotonous-voiced head coach here.

Not just yet.What I don’t think is the answer, though, is inserting Richard Matvichuk into the lineup just yet. I still think this team needs to fully buy into a newly implemented system — a system many of these guys really haven’t played too much of, nor have had time to get acclimated. Granted, if we’re still watching this team have the same problems by the end of this road trip, I will surely scream for the addition of Matvichuk and maybe even newly acquired bruiser Sheldon Brookbank into the lineup, but for now? Give them time. And Colin White. Give them Colin White, too.

Really, though, I think this team will be just fine. Despite all my complaints about the weak defense, I still maintain that the Atlantic as a whole has teams full of weak defense, which will ultimately bode well for Louie Lams and the boys.

If not?

Well, I don’t know.

That was quite reassuring, huh?

Share

WPSN comments

15 Comments on "COMMENTARY: Oh D!"

  1. PatD on Wed, 10th Oct 2007 1:20 pm 

    Perhaps one of the problems why our defense is so lazy and undisciplined is because we don’t have a captain telling them that what they are doing is wrong and telling them what needs to be fixed, another reason our defense looks like amateur hour at the Apollo is because that’s what they are, amateurs, they are all young except for Chuck but he doesn’t even play. We really need White to come back and turn into a leader and instead of using his anger to take penalties he can use his anger to yell at the D to get in position.

  2. NJDevil on Wed, 10th Oct 2007 1:53 pm 

    We have no D. They’re in big trouble. Why Matvachuk isn’t playing is beyond me. And I never thought I’d say that.

    However I have faith in Sutter. He’ll fix it. Just need to give him some more time. One step at a time. There shouldn’t be steps, but there are. And we’ve got a ton of them to climb right now.

  3. Pat on Wed, 10th Oct 2007 4:32 pm 

    Possibly clearing space to pick up Markov?

    They are currently have $1.827 in cap space and getting rid of Matv gives them $3.195. He’s asking 3.5. If we can get him for $2.5 or less, it will still give us some breathing room.

  4. MIKE HARRISON on Wed, 10th Oct 2007 4:35 pm 

    2007/08 Devils are a whole new ballgame, out with the old and in with the new…system and players. It is early and Sutter is forming a team that fits his style. Lets wait and see, come April the Devs might be the hottest team in the NHL…only time will tell.
    Have faith in the organization, Lou would’nt let all this happen if he thought the team was heading in the wrong direction.

  5. Shari on Wed, 10th Oct 2007 5:09 pm 

    I agree with pretty much everything said here, I don’t know why Matty was getting scratched or is being traded, but I wish Him the best of luck and I thought that at times He was our Best D man on the ice, We as fans are going to have to see how things pan out and give Sutter a chance to do things His way, and Yes Lou would not let certain things happen if He didn’t agree with them or have a plan, Pattty had a better game on Monday and needs to step it up and I think He will. PLEASE WHITEY COME BACK. Hell at this point I say get the headset off of Albie brush off the mothballs and get Him back out on the ice, I guarantee You He will play like He never left.

  6. Devil Fan in NC on Wed, 10th Oct 2007 6:15 pm 

    I am worried but I have to look at this way; its has been 15 years in the good old “trap” style. They have to get use to the new system. I like them being aggressive but their scores need to step it up.

    On a side note, I have the center ice package since I live in NC, so I have the lovely luxury listen to other broadcasters instead of the good old Doc and Chico. So I was watching the devs sens game and one of the announcers made the comment that when Stevens and Daneyko stopped playing no other player had their numbers and when Nieder left his number was used the next season. He went on stating that because he was such a great player that the devs should have not been so quick to have another player use the number? Wha? I don’t agree with it. What does everyone else think?

  7. Shari on Wed, 10th Oct 2007 7:39 pm 

    I think that We all can agree that Nieder helped this team with His awesome play and no one in the League skates the way He does, and I think that the Dev’s will always miss Him on the blueline, and He will always be one of My all time favs, however in reality, He was suspended at least twice that I can think of because He didn’t like His contract and refused to report to camp, He also dragged His feet about leaving and by the time He decided to go there were no good D left and the best that Lou could do was Ken Klee (no offense Ken)so had He left on better terms maybe I would agree to wait a while before giving out His #. As much as He gave to this club the way that He left His number should be fair game.

  8. mazz on Wed, 10th Oct 2007 7:44 pm 

    Nieds left by his own choice… i see no issue at all using his number the next season. Bbut regarding this news about Matvichuk i see no harm in it.. My initial thought was it would bring us closer to getting Markov (which would be great). Ur thoughts?

    BTW.. great site Patricia, i haven’t told you since we ran into eachother that oen night.

  9. ILoveJamie15 on Wed, 10th Oct 2007 7:53 pm 

    I can’t believe Mattie is gonna get traded…
    We ought to keep him atleast until Whitey comes back though…I don’t think our defense has ever looked so bad…that is if we still have defense.

  10. Patricia Greuter on Wed, 10th Oct 2007 8:06 pm 

    Haha thanks Vin! That night was nuts…

    I don’t know if we’re going for Markov. I’m leaning more towards no. Getting rid of Matvichuk frees up some cap room, but I’d rather have White back at this point. I initially thought that Mattie being traded would signal the triumphant return of Mr. Anger Management, but others have been saying he is still a ways away from returning. Sigh.

    Not sure if I want Markov on this team. With the sorry state of our D, I’m sure it couldn’t hurt, but he does want, what, like 3.5 mill a season? Not to mention, he wants a multi-year deal. I can’t see Lou giving another multi-year contract, not right now at least.

  11. MIKE HARRISON on Wed, 10th Oct 2007 8:10 pm 

    As far as Stevens and Dano’s numbers not being given out after they stopped playing is cause they retired…as Devils, Nieder bolted to another team, when he was here he was a big part of the team…thanks, but he decided to leave…goodbye….lets move on, number 27 is available to be used.
    Everyone is saying sign Markov….but he’s been with like 6 teams in the last 7 years…something aint right there, plus he’s not signed right now…why-not…something must be up with him. And I read he has only like 25 assist’s in the last 2 seasons (and he was a Red Wing last year)not exactly a big point getter. Probably not worth the 3+ mil he’s looking for.

  12. Mike on Thu, 11th Oct 2007 8:15 am 

    I agree on Markov. From what I read of him, he just sounds like another Vishnevski, but not as good defensively. DM isn’t going to lead your PP, apparently he just runs around crazy trying to punish other players.

    I think Paul Martin needs to step up his offensive game. The last couple of years his offensive game has slipped as he’s gotten more minutes. Maybe Larry Robinson can install some confidence in him to open up.

  13. Dana B on Thu, 11th Oct 2007 8:49 am 

    damn..i really liked matvichuck…the devs have been interested in markov..so they could be looking to trade

  14. Randy on Thu, 11th Oct 2007 1:22 pm 

    Granted I have not seen Markov in game action in a while; however, he was +25 last season and did log a good number of minutes per game. It is obvious that RM is just to slow for the new NHL. If the cap room gets freed up, my bet is Markov is a Devil shortly thereafter.I don’t care if his offensive numbers are small if he can get to loose pucks in our zone and connect on a pass to a forward. The D needs stability.

  15. Dopler on Tue, 23rd Oct 2007 8:35 pm 

    I visited your web site.
    Sample design…
    Glad to see other.